Your message dated Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:25:48 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#176075: dpkg-dev: 822-date does not need to use perl
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2003 01:37:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 09 19:37:30 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Wo6z-0001L6-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 19:37:30 -0600
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 31CC15F79D; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 02:37:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix/Md, from userid 1001)
id 0C9C533BEA; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 02:03:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg-dev: 822-date does not need to use perl
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 02:03:12 +0100 (CET)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.10.9
Severity: wishlist
Please use this trivial shell script instead:
#!/bin/sh -e
exec /bin/date --rfc-822
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 176075-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2003 10:25:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 10 04:25:56 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from home.wiggy.net (mx1.wiggy.net) [213.84.101.140]
([u0vkGHvxSuBrXOxYfDEDmfqlvvcvKjaR])
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18WwMN-0007CF-00; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 04:25:55 -0600
Received: from wichert by mx1.wiggy.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18WwMG-0000CK-00; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:25:48 +0100
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 11:25:48 +0100
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Marco d'Itri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#176075: dpkg-dev: 822-date does not need to use perl
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.5 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Previously Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Please use this trivial shell script instead:
>
> #!/bin/sh -e
> exec /bin/date --rfc-822
That isn't portable. dpkg is.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wiggy.net/
A random hacker
