Your message dated Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:25:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: your mail
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2003 16:08:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 16 10:08:22 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns1.greenbush.com [216.220.232.4] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18ZCZ4-0005qe-00; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 10:08:22 -0600
Received: from ns1.greenbush.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by ns1.greenbush.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id
h0GG8KQF021503
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL);
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:08:21 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by ns1.greenbush.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) id h0GG8K8u021501;
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:08:20 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: apt: apt-get should have an --assume-no option
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 11:08:04 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0
tests=MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apt
Version: 0.5.4
Severity: normal
The --assume-yes option is not practical on many systems, since
many packages would fail if conffiles are overwritten, so it is not
possible to have an unattended installation.
An option to assume "no" to all prompts regarding new versions of
conffiles is would permit unattended installation.
Regards,
Bob
--
System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux lian 2.4.18 #1 Thu Aug 29 13:28:36 EDT 2002 i686
unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Versions of the packages apt depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libstdc++2.10- 2.95.4-15 The GNU stdc++ library
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 177007-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jan 2003 21:25:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 16 15:25:49 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from home.wiggy.net (mx1.wiggy.net) [213.84.101.140]
([ff+3p+WelEfazLXTrc14wk1V0JvWpWh4])
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18ZHWF-00040y-00; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 15:25:48 -0600
Received: from wichert by mx1.wiggy.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18ZHWB-0007CN-00; Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:25:43 +0100
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 22:25:43 +0100
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dpkg Development <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Processed: your mail
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
APT Development Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Dpkg Development <[email protected]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-12.5 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,REFERENCES,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
dpkg has a --force-confold option to do this.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wiggy.net/
A random hacker
