Your message dated Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:30:51 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#177487: dpkg: -l can't deal with long package names
intellegently
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2003 23:11:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 19 17:11:12 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tx.symonds.net [64.246.28.87]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18aOau-0007Cm-00; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:11:12 -0600
Received: from tc210-203-44-10.3-16.pl.ebtnet.net ([210.203.44.10]
helo=jidanni.org)
by tx.symonds.net with asmtp (Exim 4.04)
id 18aOar-0006BJ-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 18:11:11 -0500
Received: from jidanni by jidanni.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18aMdh-0000XR-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 05:05:57 +0800
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg: -l can't deal with long package names intellegently
X-Debbugs-CC: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 20 Jan 2003 05:05:57 +0800
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 45
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.1 required=5.0
tests=SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.10.9
Severity: normal
one must go thru many exercises with COLUMNS= to reveal the full
names, while at the same time there is lots of space left after the
version number. here we see 17 items that look the same
dpkg -l \*openoff*|sort|uniq -c
1
+++-=================-=================-==================================================
1 Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
1 ii openoffice.org 1.0.1-6 high-quality office
productivity suite
1 ii openoffice.org-bi 1.0.1-6 OpenOffice.org office suite
binary files
1 ii openoffice.org-de 1.0.1-6+2 Debian specific parts of
OpenOffice.org package
1 ii openoffice.org-he 1.0.1-6 OpenOffice.org office suite
help (English)
1 ii openoffice.org-l1 1.0.1-6 chinese_traditional language
package for openoffic
1 in openoffice.org-l1 1.0.1-6 (no description available)
1 pn libming-fonts-ope <none> (no description available)
1 un openoffice <none> (no description available)
2 un openoffice.org-he <none> (no description available)
17 un openoffice.org-l1 <none> (no description available)
3 un openoffice.org-sp <none> (no description available)
1 un ttf-openoffice <none> (no description available)
1 |
Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
1 |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err:
uppercase=bad)
1 ||/ Name Version Description
05:02 ~$
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.19-k7 #1 Sun Oct 6 20:29:56 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5
Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii dselect 1.10.9 a user tool to manage Debian packa
ii libc6 2.3.1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
--
http://jidanni.org/ Taiwan(04)25854780
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 177487-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2003 23:30:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 19 17:30:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from home.wiggy.net (mx1.wiggy.net) [213.84.101.140]
([wjk55HdqItKqS54AaDHdOLNs6ArrfGim])
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18aOu1-0000EH-00; Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:30:57 -0600
Received: from wichert by mx1.wiggy.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18aOtv-0008N7-00; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:30:51 +0100
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:30:51 +0100
From: Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#177487: dpkg: -l can't deal with long package names
intellegently
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.0 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Previously Dan Jacobson wrote:
> one must go thru many exercises with COLUMNS= to reveal the full
> names, while at the same time there is lots of space left after the
> version number. here we see 17 items that look the same
Try using dpkg-query with the --showformat and --show options.
Wichert.
--
Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wiggy.net/
A random hacker
