Previously Martin Quinson wrote: > AFAIK, you're moving to DocBook sgml, not xml. At least, that's what you did > put in the cvs...
Temporarily, since I haven't been able to get docbook/xml to work properly on my system. If you look closer at the file you'll see that except for the doctype it mostly is valid xml. > You're speaking about poxml, I guess. It has several limitation over po4a. > For example, the way translators can add a section in the translation to > explain who did the translation, and where to repport bugs isn't very > natural. Since dpkg translators should be reachable through the debian-dpkg list anyway I don't consider that a very important drawback. I'm willing to look at other tools such as yours though. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.wiggy.net/ A random hacker
