Your message dated Mon, 09 Aug 2004 17:55:37 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#264349: dpkg -s package should display all the files
installed from this package?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Aug 2004 11:03:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 08 04:03:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 93.red-80-59-71.pooles.rima-tde.net (canostra) [80.59.71.93]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BtlSP-0003kb-00; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 04:03:18 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(uid 1000)
by canostra with local; Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:02:41 +0200
id 0016362E.41160852.0000118E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Xan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg -s package should display all the files installed from this
package?
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2004 13:02:41 +0200
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: dpkg
Version: 1.10.23
Severity: wishlist
I think that it were useful display all installed files when someone
type "dpkg -s package-name". Some packages install some files with a
non-intuitive name, and for having more information.
I could be add automatically (I am not system administrator, but with
any cron/anacron job?) for any release of package.
The ideal is that apt-cache show package-name displays the same
information, and so, for example, we could compare the files of
different versions of packages in faster way.
Thanks,
Xan.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-rc2
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (ignored: LC_ALL set to ca_ES)
Versions of packages dpkg depends on:
ii dselect 1.10.23 a user tool to manage Debian packa
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-15 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 264349-done) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2004 16:55:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 09 09:55:48 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [62.49.129.34]
(qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuDR6-0000NN-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 09:55:48 -0700
Received: (qmail 20919 invoked from network); 9 Aug 2004 16:55:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by localhost with RC4-MD5 encrypted SMTP; 9 Aug 2004 16:55:45 -0000
Subject: Re: Bug#264349: dpkg -s package should display all the files
installed from this package?
From: Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Xan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-My3TSUgZli1ODf5vawIu"
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 17:55:37 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.91
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--=-My3TSUgZli1ODf5vawIu
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 13:02 +0200, Xan wrote:
> I think that it were useful display all installed files when someone
> type "dpkg -s package-name". Some packages install some files with a
> non-intuitive name, and for having more information.
>=20
That's what "dpkg -L package-name" does.
Scott
--=20
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
--=-My3TSUgZli1ODf5vawIu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBBF6yIIexP3IStZ2wRAppZAJ9059KH+B36nGhOREuotU8pFGd3IQCfa6Lo
k3rIy+4LtbKCYgvDvzMzdRc=
=uNCY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-My3TSUgZli1ODf5vawIu--
