On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 08:14:50PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-29 20:31]: > > You're avoiding my previous question: > > He's not. There are 2 different questions about consistency. You > cannot fulfil both of them at the same time. Scott and I care about > the Linux arches being consistent.
I didn't intend to bring up a discussion which of the "consistency areas" is more important to satisfy (since I have all the keys to lose anyway ;). My point is that in the _long term_ we can have a scheme that is consistent in both regards. However.. > (And as I said, the ideal solution would be to split > Architecture into Architecture and Kernel, I suppose). ..that is a solution I'll be happy to explore if the dpkg maintainers are satisfied with it. -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `' http://www.debian.org/ports/freebsd/gnu-libc-based `-
