Your message dated Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:20:48 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#252657: dpkg-dev: [arch]-specific Depends broken (see
#170575)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2004 15:37:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 04 08:37:05 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from server.logic.univie.ac.at [131.130.190.41]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BWGki-0000fB-00; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 08:37:05 -0700
Received: from balrog.logic.univie.ac.at ([131.130.190.58]
ident=[HEP/E9zmndV0cHA0k537Vuxju6l8W7A9])
by server.logic.univie.ac.at with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1BWGkf-0000JV-6J; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:37:01 +0200
Received: from ametzler by balrog.logic.univie.ac.at with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BWGkc-0002Nc-S8; Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:36:59 +0200
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 17:36:58 +0200
From: Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dpkg-dev: [arch]-specific Depends broken (see #170575)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
X-Archive: encrypt
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.10.22
Severity: important
| dpkg (1.10.11) unstable; urgency=low
| * All dependency fields parsed by controllib.pl support [arch]
| specifiers. If the arch specifier doesn't apply for the current
| arch, then the item will not be added to the internal list structure.
| [...]
| * Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| Allow for per-arch generated dependency fields. Closes: #170575
Hello,
This does not work (anymore), dpkg will generate a package without
*any* depends if e.g.
"Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, debconf,grub[i386]"
is used in debian/control.
cu andreas
PS: Thanks to Andrew Suffield for pointing out that this is supposed
to work.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 252657-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 14:20:58 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 18 06:20:58 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from populous.netsplit.com (mailgate.netsplit.com) [62.49.129.34]
(qmailr)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DCILL-0007oq-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 06:20:51 -0800
Received: (qmail 5738 invoked from network); 18 Mar 2005 14:20:48 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO descent.netsplit.com) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by populous.netsplit.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2005 14:20:48 -0000
Subject: Re: Bug#252657: dpkg-dev: [arch]-specific Depends broken (see
#170575)
From: Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-E1WkvXtwDd3TCuS4Qs5T"
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:20:48 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
VALID_BTS_CONTROL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
--=-E1WkvXtwDd3TCuS4Qs5T
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
severity 252657 wishlist
retitle 252657 "[DPKG-DEV] support arch-specific Depends"
thanks
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 17:36 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> | dpkg (1.10.11) unstable; urgency=3Dlow
> | * All dependency fields parsed by controllib.pl support [arch]
> | specifiers. If the arch specifier doesn't apply for the current
> | arch, then the item will not be added to the internal list struct=
ure.
> | [...]
> | * Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> | Allow for per-arch generated dependency fields. Closes: #17057=
5
>=20
> This does not work (anymore), dpkg will generate a package without
> *any* depends if e.g.
> "Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, debconf,grub[i386]"
> is used in debian/control.
>=20
This has nothing to do with regexs; this is simply that arch-specific
dependencies are not permitted in anything but Build-*.
Scott
--=20
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
--=-E1WkvXtwDd3TCuS4Qs5T
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBCOuO+IexP3IStZ2wRAp1nAJ99vOPBvywIZledvDY0txsNmMr6xQCggHD5
dK2cAUxYoiDOh12eyKSId5Y=
=AMlH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-E1WkvXtwDd3TCuS4Qs5T--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
