On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 04:50:13PM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] is unavailable for at least 4 days now. It seems that >ns2.dpkg.org is misconfigured (refuses to give out details), and ns0 and >ns1 are down.
OK, I've mailed Scott. >Related, out of curiosity (not my decision by any length), why is >actually [EMAIL PROTECTED] used as official maintainer address, rather than >simply [email protected], which would seem much more natural >to me? Scott chose the maintainer address: "[Using [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED] was deliberate -- otherwise you'd have bugs being sent to both debian-dpkg and debian-dpkg-bugs." --bod -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
