On Fri August 31 2007 07:54:51 am Ian Jackson wrote: > > addition of libbz2 as pseudo-essential should not be a big deal, > > it's quite small, and most of the code is duped already due to it > > being statically linked. > > Why are we not using external programs for this ? Does anyone know ?
So the package handling system doesn't stand to break because of a bug in one of them? > Using external programs simplifies dpkg's build process, makes tuning > particular installations easier, makes better use of multiple CPUs, > and generally seems superior in almost every respect. except robustness, imo - Bruce -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
