On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 19:27:24 +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > I really think this would make it easier in the long run to add features > like #440636 (e.g. compatibility with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=parallel=n) and > #4655 (i.e. more sanity checks before starting with the build). It also > would it make easier to profit from advances in the move to real Perl > modules. Also it enables l10n without much (programming) effort.
Yes, such a rewrite has crossed my mind few times, I'd say go ahead! Maybe it would also make sense to switch dpkg-name. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
