Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Thus I'm wondering if we shouldn't follow the linux development model. > Have a cycle of say one month, merge stuff aggressively during 10 days, > make an upload to experimental and run the new dpkg on our own computers > during 20 days more and then upload to unstable (once bugs have been > ironed out). >
After some discussion on -release, I would like to see this implemented.
Dpkg is a rather important bit of software in Debian, and having any
problems reach testing would be a bad thing(tm)[0].
Thus, extensive testing should occur before uploads. I strongly
reccomend the use of experimental rather than unstable for this :)
Neil
[0] For example, it would break security buildds.
--
* Maulkin cries
<Maulkin> NB: rm -rf /chroots/sarge while /home is mounted at
/chroots/sarge/home is NOT-A-GOOD-THING(tm)
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
