Ian Jackson wrote:
> Raphael Hertzog writes ("Re: triggers in dpkg, and dpkg maintenance"):>> FWIW, you do have access to the repository but I would request you to be >> removed from the team if you made usage of it in a way that doesn't >> conform to the rules of the team. This includes having meaningful commit >> logs and using private rebased branches for most of the work except when >> we have a public branch where multiple persons of the team cooperate (such >> as what happens with the sourcev3 branch currently). >> http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/Dpkg/GitUsage > > This development model has been imported from the Linux kernel. It > may be appropriate when there are hundreds or thousands of people > generating huge quantities of patches, all trying to get their changes > committed, with no organisational connection to the handful of people > picked by the original author who need to act as gatekeeper. > > It is not appropriate for a project which has about four people > submitting any significant number of patches, all of whom are fully > signed-up members of a shared governance infrastructure, and where the > gatekeepers are just the people in that project whose hands the code > has most recently fallen into. What's the intention of discussing dpkg package team's internals on the debian-devel list? Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
