On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 12:20:07 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Tue, 19 May 2009, Guillem Jover wrote: > > Well, to me the main reason is that those packages are already broken > > per policy, and this is just to avoid even more breakage. > > Well, there's "broken per policy" and "broken as in mis-compiled". > Removing the variables without informing maintainers in time will > lead to the latter. Right now we only have the former. > > So I'm ok to remove them but not without advance warning on d-d-a.
Ok, let's do this then. I'll be prearing the release later today and writting a draft to be sent to d-d-a. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
