Tollef Fog Heen <[email protected]> writes: > ]] Joey Hess
> | I support changing 3.0 (git) to use a bundle. Besides closing the bugs > | mentioned in this thread, a bundle consists of a simple header + a > | standard git pack. Since git packs are used as a wire format, this > | provides better assurance that future versions of git will retain > | compatability with the source packages. Also, being able to directly > | clone a bundle file is a great feature. > Just to be sure: Bundles can include multiple branches, tags and all, > right? Yup! They're quite nice. I only discovered them recently, but they're also fantastic for sharing pending security patches that cannot yet be publicly disclosed among the co-maintainers of a package. -- Russ Allbery ([email protected]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
