Currently, dpkg lets interested packages know when saving a
backup (.dpkg-dist file) for an updated conffile that is not
going to used.
This is, strictly speaking, harmless, since file triggers were
never a guarantee that a file was actually modified. But on one
hand, the triggered action can be an expensive no-op (such as
restarting a server process), and on the other hand, any package
that relies on triggers being activated in this case will break
once some user decides not to keep a .dpkg-dist file. So it
seems safer to avoid the unnecessary and misleading trigger.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>
---
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Nothing else like this seems to stand out among the remaining changes.
> I did find what looks like a minor pre-existing bug. Patch to come.
On reflection, 'bug' is a little too strong a word. :) But this is an
improvement, imho.
Patch applies to master.
src/configure.c | 1 -
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/configure.c b/src/configure.c
index f5254bc..63b2e87 100644
--- a/src/configure.c
+++ b/src/configure.c
@@ -164,7 +164,6 @@ deferred_configure_conffile(struct pkginfo *pkg, struct
conffile *conff)
varbufaddstr(&cdr, DPKGDISTEXT);
varbufaddc(&cdr, 0);
strcpy(cdr2rest, DPKGNEWEXT);
- trig_file_activate(usenode, pkg);
if (rename(cdr2.buf, cdr.buf))
warning(_("%s: failed to rename '%.250s' to '%.250s':
%s"),
pkg->name, cdr2.buf, cdr.buf, strerror(errno));
--
1.6.5.2
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
