Raphael Hertzog <[email protected]> (22/07/2010):
> > Unless I'm missing something, the “increment” part is processed
> > before the condition is checked, meaning one can happily
> > dereference sl without checking for its being non-0.
> 
> Except that if "sl" is NULL from the start, the loop is not executed.

(There's no “except”. One *can*. I didn't write “one will necessarily
will”.)

> Can you verify if the attached patch is enough?

Yes (and yes).

Mraw,
KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to