Hi, On Freitag, 12. November 2010, Norbert Preining wrote: > Sorry dpkg guys for involving you into that. > > I have seen the bug report, checked the code, missed the || true I had > already added, and only afterwards realized the the bug report > was done with an ancient version of tex-common - which I also missed.
I'm very sorry too, what else can I say. Running piuparts constantly against
the archive results in me see so many errors that sometimes I dont check
carefully enough, whether a reported problem still exists or if it is/was a
problem at all.
piuparts.d.o consists of 90k test logs, eg squeeze has an impressive number of
27526 successfully tests and only 108 failed ones - but then there are also
570 in other states...
And it's mostly only me trying to digg through all of this, deal with all
those bugs in our amazing package universe and those in piuparts, that I
sometimes make mistakes.
So once again, sorry for wasting your time and thanks for making Debian even
better!
cheers,
Holger
P.S.: about the problem at hand: piuparts.d.o regulary tests new versions of
packages, but doesnt detect, if new depends are available. This is obviously
fixable, but so are tons of things in piuparts...
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
