Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Guillem Jover <[email protected]> writes:
>> Tracking fds is going to be easier, at that point dpkg already has >> the stat information, so it could queue an fd per unique st_dev for >> example. > > That sounds like a good plan. How hard would it be to implement this > based on FDs instead of path? Would the ioctl patch need changes to work > on an FD instead of path? (sorry, haven't read the patch) It uses fds. BTW review of the dpkg and kernel patches would be quite welcome. Both are simple, or so I hope. I would like to send another version or the dpkg patch with sync-per-filesystem enabled unconditionally when it works on Linux (thus no string changes) and fsync_or_sync_filesystem implemented in a separate file; if there are other updates to include at the same time, that would be nice. Regards, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20101128233340.ga25...@burratino
