On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 19:04:16 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 03:47:00AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > So I guess this would need either the corresponding fixup in > > debian/rules, > > Ah, yes; hadn't realized that this was being done via debian/rules, I guess > it would have had to be since dpkg was otherwise in sync between Debian and > Ubuntu. I can add this.
My hope is to be able to eventually remove that code in the future somehow. :) > > or maybe better to use a regex for the GNU triplet, although then the > > bi-direction mapping becomes a bit more cumbersome, but I don't think we > > need it right now anyway? > > ... or I can drop the bi-directional mapping, too, whichever you prefer. I > agree that there's no strong need for it, I was just following the model of > the existing code. > > I don't think it's worth doing this with regex, though; I would just add > multiple entries to the table. Well it's probably more future proof, but I don't think I really mind either way (regex or explicit list). > BTW, I've just noticed that the !linux i386 architectures also need to be > added to this table; sorry about that. I can clean that up at the same time > as fixing the above issue, however you recommend it be fixed. Oh right! How annoying. :) Hmm, or maybe given that the only current exception is i386, we are just better off handling it directly in the function, we can always move to a table or whatever if there happens to be more special casing in the future (which I doubt?). thanks, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
