sean finney wrote: > Honestly I don't have the same recollection of that, ISTR having a some > good back and forth, at least earlier on in the thread. I might have > lost some stream (and I'll admit, might have got a bit grumpy) towards > the end though.
Yep, I was just responding to the grumpiness. As I said, I don't blame you for it at all. > The feedback cycles took long enough that every time I went to > respin the patches I'd end up with having to manually resolve > conflicts, and for some reason these conflicts were particularly > cumbersome to resolve. I was hoping that we could at least agree on the > parts that were non controversial and at the same time make it > easier to work out the remaining implementation details. Ah, excellent! That gives a way forward. I will try rerolling against current dpkg tonight (or if someone else wants to do the same I won't mind), and we can go from there. Thanks again; I quite liked the general direction of that series. Regards, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110504225321.GA12615@elie
