* Russ Allbery <r...@debian.org>, 2012-01-02, 13:51:
          <p>
            A common example of when a change
            to <var>minimal-version</var> is required is a function that
            takes an enum or struct argument that controls what the
            function does.  For example:
            <example>
enum library_op { OP_FOO, OP_BAR };
int library_do_operation(enum library_op);
            </example>
            If a new operation, <tt>OP_BAZ</tt>, is added,
            the <var>minimal-version</var>
            of <tt>library_do_operation</tt> must be increased to the
            version at which <tt>OP_BAZ</tt> was introduced.  Otherwise, a
            binary built against the new version of the library (having
            detected at compile-time that the library
            supports <tt>OP_BAZ</tt>) may be installed with a shared
            library that doesn't support <tt>OP_BAZ</tt> and will fail at
            runtime when it tries to pass <tt>OP_BAZ</tt> into this
            function.
          </p>

Hmm. It was my understanding that one of the purposes of Build-Depends-Package is to avoid bumping symbol versions in situations like this.

--
Jakub Wilk


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dpkg-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120103232901.ga9...@jwilk.net

Reply via email to