On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 13:52:34 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Aron Xu <[email protected]> writes: > > This looks not very nice, because we need to maintain a list of > > architectures in debian/control, and when new architectures are added > > the package is potentially broken. > > If endian dependend data is really a larger issue then introduce a > > dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ENDIANESS
This already exists: DEB_BUILD_ARCH_ENDIAN and DEB_HOST_ARCH_ENDIAN regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
