Guillem Jover wrote:
>> On 2012-03-16 15:07 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
>>> + if (opt_verbose > 0)
>>> + printf(_("Ignoring removal of shared diversion
>>> '%s'.\n"),
>>> + diversion_describe(contest));
[...]
> Would the following clarify?
>
> "Ignoring removal request of shared diversion '%s'.\n"
Yes, I think so. Micronit: it would sound more natural with s/of/for/.
> If so, I'll be including this in the last push I'm about to do today,
> before the upload, after I've ironed out a corner-case I stumbled over.
Thanks.
Jonathan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120316201733.GD29429@burratino
