On Apr 20, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Guillem Jover wrote: > Well, certainly at least something clearer than libgtk2.0-0:any. I've > put that on my list of messages to clarify for 1.16.3 or 1.16.4. > > thanks, > guillem
Awesome guillem, thanks. Regarding your previous email: On Apr 20, 2012, at 11:56 AM, Guillem Jover wrote: > Either install libgtk2.0-0:i386 (and any other missing dependencies > from i386), or use also --force-depends (but I don't see how the > package would work if it's missing appropriate shared libraries?). I was curious about that too. It turns out that Adobe ships a bunch of libraries along with the compiled executable and modifies your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I can verify that acroread does run under Wheezy. I tried installing libgtk2.0-0:i386 that but it seems like not all the appropriate packages in the dependency chain are multi-arch (or maybe the system is misconfigured): > chiestand@wheezy:/tmp$ sudo apt-get install -f libgtk2.0-0:i386 > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have > requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable > distribution that some required packages have not yet been created > or been moved out of Incoming. > The following information may help to resolve the situation: > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > libgtk2.0-0:i386 : Depends: shared-mime-info:i386 but it is not going to be > installed > Recommends: hicolor-icon-theme:i386 but it is not > installable > E: Broken packages If I trace the dependency down a couple levels I get this: > chiestand@wheezy:/tmp$ sudo apt-get install -f libxml2:i386 > Reading package lists... Done > Building dependency tree > Reading state information... Done > The following extra packages will be installed: > conky-cli emacs23-nox gcc-4.7-base:i386 icedtea-7-jre-cacao > icedtea-7-jre-jamvm libc6:i386 libc6-i686:i386 libgcc1:i386 > openjdk-7-jre-headless openjdk-7-jre-lib pcb-lesstif pinentry-curses > zlib1g:i386 > Suggested packages: > apcupsd moc mpd emacs23-common-non-dfsg glibc-doc:i386 locales:i386 > sun-java6-fonts fonts-ipafont-gothic fonts-ipafont-mincho ttf-wqy-microhei > ttf-wqy-zenhei ttf-indic-fonts pinentry-doc > Recommended packages: > xml-core:i386 > The following packages will be REMOVED: > 3depict abiword abiword-plugin-grammar abiword-plugin-mathview > acedb-other-belvu acedb-other-dotter adobe-flashplugin adun.app aeskulap > aisleriot akonadi-server akonadiconsole akregator alacarte alien alien-hunter > amide amor arduino > ark audacity avahi-daemon avogadro bamfdaemon baobab bauble bibus bind9 > bind9-host bind9utils blinken blogilo bomber bovo brasero cadabra cantor > cantor-backend-kalgebra caret cb2bib cba cervisia cheese chemical-mime-data > chemical-structures chemtool cmake conky-all connectomeviewer context > context-modules coq coq-theories coqide ctsim cvsservice dcmtk dconf-tools > debhelper default-jdk default-jre deluge deluge-gtk deluge-torrent > desktop-base > dh-autoreconf dh-make dia dia-common dia-libs dicomscope dnsutils dolphin > dragonplayer easychem eclipse eclipse-cdt eclipse-egit eclipse-emf > eclipse-emf-examples eclipse-emf-sdk eclipse-gef eclipse-gef-doc eclipse-jdt > eclipse-mylyn > … A ton of packages would be removed, including libxml2 libxml2-dev libxml2-utils. I'm confused about where the conflict comes from. Is there a tool to help narrow down where the conflict arises? libxml2 source shows that it has "Architecture: any", so I'd imagine that should be not be a conflict even though there is no Multi-Arch field. -Chris
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
