2012/7/13 Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]>: > Martin-Éric Racine wrote: >> (putting back the CC to the bug, which will probably need to be >> reassigned to 'linux') >> 2012/7/13 Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]>: >>> (dropping dpkg maintainers from cc) >>> Martin-Éric Racine wrote: > >>>> I'm already aware of the effects of stripping binaries. However, you >>>> gotta admit that 488MB compared to 22MB is just ridiculous; something >>>> is definitely broken in those 3.2 build scripts. >>> >>> Are the build scripts responsible for the size of debugging symbols? >>> I don't follow. >>> >>> Or do you mean that the size of the kernel -dbg packages is >>> ridiculous? >> >> I mean that the size of the kernel package produced by 'make deb-pkg' >> from the 3.2 vanilla tree, even after disabling debug symbols, is >> highly suspicious, compared to the stock Debian kernel with the same >> source. > > Ok, I missed that. What is that size?
As written above, the custom package came out to 488MB compared to 22MB for linux-image-3.2.0-3-686-pae from Wheezy. > Just to confirm, are you certain CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO is disabled? Yup. Martin-Éric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAPZXPQe76THt-3mn=uuo9gfx85ovdgbjux+6v1jphbtlyax...@mail.gmail.com
