Le 26/06/2011 17:47, Ian Zimmerman a écrit : > So yes, I'd say that the fact the dependency is too loose to catch this > pernicious problem on a system configured this way is a bug. (I'm not > asking for "support" beyond fixing bugs, though) ;-)
In my opinion, the versioned dependency to libev-dev in liblwt-ocaml-dev should be filled automatically, the same way it is for liblwt-ocaml. But I don't know how to do it. dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't seem to be designed to work this way. If so, I would say the bug is on dpkg-shlibdeps's side; however it looks like a corner case, whose fix looks difficult and intrusive... I've put debian-dpkg in CC. Let's see if someone there has a suggestion. Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
