On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Guillem Jover <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kevin! > > On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 16:29:22 +0200, Kevin Bortis wrote: >> This patch adds support for a musl libc port to ostable and >> triplettable. It would be nice if you could add this patch. > > Just for reference this seems to be <http://www.musl-libc.org/>.
Correct. > > (The patch seems to be mangled, missing hardtabs for example.) > >> --- >> ostable | 1 + >> triplettable | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/ostable b/ostable >> index ddc4b04..83eef37 100644 >> --- a/ostable >> +++ b/ostable >> @@ -32,3 +32,4 @@ sysv-solaris solaris solaris[^-]* >> uclibceabi-uclinux uclinux-uclibceabi uclinux[^-]*-uclibceabi >> uclibc-uclinux uclinux-uclibc uclinux[^-]*(-uclibc.*)? >> tos-mint mint mint[^-]* >> +musleabihf-linux linux-musleabihf linux[^-]*-musleabihf >> diff --git a/triplettable b/triplettable >> index 11f8a54..f6f8222 100644 >> --- a/triplettable >> +++ b/triplettable >> @@ -23,3 +23,5 @@ sysv-solaris-<cpu> solaris-<cpu> >> uclibceabi-uclinux-arm uclinux-armel >> uclibc-uclinux-<cpu> uclinux-<cpu> >> tos-mint-m68k mint-m68k >> +musleabihf-linux-arm musl-armhf >> + > > I've queued locally the attached patch, which names the architectures > as musl-linux-<cpu>, so that they do not get confused as a different > kernel (the current <kernel>-<cpu> form, when <kernel> is not linux). > I've also added the general form for non-armhf as I see there's other > architectures supported by the library. Let me know if this looks ok. > Looks awesome. Thanks for your help. > Thanks, > Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/calonj1egvmavjt+ytr+3nygux0lqsajhwjxnm2tjr9tnc7p...@mail.gmail.com
