Hi! [ Simon, you might want to check out your spam filters as I think I've seen them trigger more than once on mails you have sent recently. ]
On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 11:31:30 +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > In #712903, a symbol not intended as public is used by a dependent > library. The symbol appears to be exported for the benefit of other > libraries built from the same source, so it cannot be easily hidden, but > I wonder whether it would make sense to have a mechanism that allows > dpkg-shlibdeps to fail if a symbol is referenced from a package outside > a certain set. > > Opinions? Yeah, that would be #630344. I'll eventually get to it during the 1.17.x cycle, sooner rather than latter, if no one else has proposed a solution and/or patch, as this is something that would prevent unwanted "ABI breaks" and other issues. Thanks, Guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
