On 2014-06-27 17:04, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 09:38:18PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: >>> I think we need a lintian check to gain some traction. >> >> Already implemented in 2.5.23 (#711193)[1]. > > Thanks! Seems I was fooled by outdated lintian results in the PTS. > > It didn't list an error for ploop, while running lintian locally > it in fact shows the lintian error. > > Cheers, > Moritz > >
Right, 2.5.23 was a quite recent addition, so lintian.d.o is not done reprocessing all of the packages (it re-processes up to 1024 sources a day, but often it only makes 512). We added the "last processed by Lintian/X" marker on lintian.d.o[1], so you can tell what version of Lintian produced that result. Although that is not exported to the PTS. ~Niels [1] See e.g. http://lintian.debian.org/maintainer/[email protected]#ploop -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
