On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Guillem Jover <guil...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi!
> On Sun, 2016-10-16 at 06:18:40 +0000, Debian FTP Masters wrote:
>> binary:dpkg is NEW.
>> binary:dpkg-dev is NEW.
>> binary:dselect is NEW.
>> binary:libdpkg-dev is NEW.
>> binary:libdpkg-perl is NEW.
>> source:dpkg is NEW.
>> Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
>> from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
>> OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.
>> If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.
> Unfortunately I'd like to request for this uncoordinated upload to be
> rejected. I think it might have been rejected anyway, as it has been
> the case in the past for potential dpkg backports, but still.
> YunQiang, this seems to be due to the MIPS ports, and the newish
> requirements from DAK to know all architectures present in packaging,
> or they get rejected. :( In any case, sorry I've not handled that
> before, the proper course of action here is to cherry-pick those
> changes into a stable update, which I'll be doing now.

Thank you very much for this help.

> Thanks,
> Guillem

Reply via email to