Hi! On Thu, 2025-12-04 at 13:52:00 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > I guess after skimming over the archive for the majority of addon > tarball users, I don't think I've seen much of a need for this > remapping support (to be clear not denying there is going to be > cases where it applies, it just feels like that might be a minor > set?), and I'm not thrilled about adding such extension that is going > to be backwards incompatible.
To clarify, backwards incompatible is not necessarily a blocker, but I think ones that can imply either silent breakage or misbuilds would be a different thing (compared to a failure to unpack). Thanks, Guillem
