Le Wed, Sep 11, 2002 at 07:15:50PM +0100, Phil Cowans �crivait: > Having looked at the Wiki, I'd like to suggest that rather than using the > current set of meta packages, one is chosen which more closely reflects > the division of subjects traditionally used in schools. This would make > it easier to set up computers depending on the lessons in which they > will be used. For examples:
This list is here to discuss those things ! I'd like that teachers, students and everyone shares their idea on how it's best done. I'd like to have relatively fine-grained metapackages, but we can have meta-metapackages if needeed. education-mathematics-school education-mathematics-college education-mathematics-university And then education-mathematics that depends on the three packages ... the problem is that the vocabulary for the level of study is not really common ... :-) > 3. Language should probably be split into 'first language' and 'foreign > languages' meta packages. Well, if you see what software are listed in this metapackage, it's not worth it yet. > A final minor point is that Services might be better renamed > Administration. I don't think so. What is described in the page is really "Services" for education purpose ... an e-learning app is not meant to administrate anything but to make people learn things. :-) Cheers, -- Rapha�l Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
