On Wed, 2004-03-24 at 01:23, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Sajith VK] > > You people has already clearly documented why each package is > > included (Really a nice job!). So if we can list the non-free > > software, the "freedom enthusiasts" can work to find/make free > > alternative for each of them. > > If there is some info missing on the list? Your "if we can list the > non-free software" make me believe you are unable to find this info on > the list.
See http://developer.skolelinux.no/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/%7Echeckout%7E/skolelinux/src/task-skolelinux/lists/workstation.txt It explains why each package is included, but says nothing about its License. Package,Why,Responsible,NeedConfig are the present parameters. Including license and Free/non-free too as parameters will be helpful. It will helpus to easly identify the non-free packages in skolelinux.... > > Now regarding flash, Why cant we avoild flash support?. > > We can't, because some service providers for the schools make web > pages using flash. It is hard to get the schools or the government to > understand that such pages is a bad idea. :/ -- "Freedom Matters" Sajith VK
