> >>>Is it planned to build an image with 2.6 kernel? I don't worry > >>>about partitioning the disk myself, but I don't have a clue > >>> how to build the image. > >> > >>It would be nice to have a linux26 option on the sarge CD, but > >> I left it out before because adding the kernel package plus > >> udebs would consume more CD space and space was tight. This > >> decision should probably be revisited. > > > > That is my last hope ;-) > > I checked the daily build from 4 Jan. 2005. The installation > > went smooth until the installer complained about the missing > > modules for the 2.6 kernel. When I ignored that, a missing lvm > > module was the problem. > > Is that going to be fixed? > > Which Image was this, and from were did you fetch this. > > The reason for askin is that there is 2 different images for > Sarge-based debian-edu, and I think none of them have a 2.6 > kernel (unless Joey changed something...). > > If you used a standard debian-installer image, I guess at least > Joey wants to know which image failed.
I used the image ftp://ftp.skolelinux.no/cd-sarge/sarge-i386-1.raw an booted with linux26 and the hardwaredetection was fine (in contrast to the 2.4 kernel). > Are you able to save the logs to a floppy ? I could try this when I'm back in school (tomorrow). Are you interested in /var/log/* or the screen-messages (if there is any difference)? What shall I do with the logs (PM, debian-edu, bug-report, ...)? Georg
