On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:34:09PM +0100, Andreas Schuldei wrote: > > > Research is ongoing. There are ACIs which could perhaps solve the > > > problem. http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/634.html > > > > > > ACIs are still experimental and not enabled in the debian > > > packages, because their interface is about to change. we could > > > compile our own openldap packages, see if we wont run into libary > > > compatibility problems and if not deal with the changing > > > interface at a later point in time. > > > > Does "experimental" only mean "their interface is about to change" or also > > "it is not tested much and may turn out to work unreliably"? > > ACIs are in wide use and seem to be stable, even in production.
now i got mail from Howard Chu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, saying: ========= There are no user-visible changes to ACI support planned. The change I was referring to is to allow dynamic (runtime) changes to regular ACLs. (At that point, I imagine the need for ACIs will vanish, but that's a different matter.) ========= this would mean it would be less hazardous to use it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
