-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04-05-2005 20:13, Harald Thingelstad wrote: > ons, 04,.05.2005 kl. 18.51 +0200, skrev Jonas Smedegaard: > > >>Hey - why make it complex with multiple branches, when what we have *is* >>(according to Knut, Andreas and possibly others) semi-stable? > > > Err.. As in "ready for production, with updates only after tested to be > in working condition". Lab environments can only do so much. Much > trouble is best shaken out by people trying these things for real.
...according to Knut, andreas and possibly others - not me ;-) Please don't cc me, I am xubscribed to the list. - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nÃr: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCeRe6n7DbMsAkQLgRAqOgAJ0bCFmNv1WQiROJthlhQ/kASClF6ACfSDcd N1XtpS0+ptCeJqOj5MxYSOk= =MVnz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
