-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05-07-2005 11:44, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Petter Reinholdtsen] > >>It also need some adjustment for the kernel used on the clients, as >>it uses unionfs and also need to handle NFS root file system. > > > I asked on #debian-kernel about unionfs, and Christoph Hellwig claimed > that "unionfs is broken and a mess", as it is "oopsable, wrong > interface and the code is a total mess". He also said "we'll > hopefully get working unionmounts upstream this year". He provided > <URL:http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/pipermail/unionfs/2005-July/> with > background information on the problems with unionfs. > > So perhaps unionfs isn't the best option for the next generation LTSP?
Did I mention initrd-netboot-tools ? - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCylrEn7DbMsAkQLgRAp9BAJ0aixw7jMFd0bSI5eQAWfe4wKUCDACgiKnd Q51BmOqLyxUPS6uAR5b+WcU= =A6Fc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
