Rene Engelhard wrote: > Hi, > Finn-Arne Johansen wrote: >>So if the backport of OOo2 provided by Rene, means that the >>OOo-debian-team will continue to provide a backport (also security >>patched if needed), then I'm willing to include the backport. But Only > > As long as it's possible (no one knows what Sun will do but I don't > guess they will completely break gcc 3.3) I will.
I guess we will find out. But then again, it could also impossible to patch OOo-1.1.x ? >>after I've tested to rebuild the packages. I don't want to end up like >>we've done with the woody-version, with a version where we have no source. > They build fine in pbuilder/sbuild if you get a j2sdk1.4 package which work > (the blackdown one on gwdg is broken, failing preinst). nobse did build > -1bpo2 and -1bpo3 himself after I gave him the source. > So that shouldn't be a problem. Any other advise - disk requirements etc ? > Of course, the wole decision is yours and I don't want to intervene in > there. I just wanted to tell that this backport is the official one done > by me and want to defend myself against "there's no/broken nn,nb > spellchecking" and such things... Well, the norwegian OOo team do try to build for other platforms than Debian, And I guess there is other solutions to spellchecking on windows, then using myspell. And we (debian-edu) share some of the same manpower, some of our key translators translates both OOo and KDE, and a lot of other debian packages as well. (almost everything but Gnome?) Oh well, thanks for your contribution, and to defend Steffan Jorris a bit: he made it quite clear both before uploading the packages to his homefolder on developer, and on irc shortly after, that these packages was from Debian-OOo2 team. -- Finn-Arne Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bzz.no/ Leverandør av support på, drift og videreutvikling av Skolelinux-løsninger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
