> Hi
Hi Steffen, > italc was discussed in the .org proposal thread, but i like the discussion of > this thread and i don't want to disturb it so I start a new (small) one :) > > Some of you wonder why italc is under the maintainance of Debian Edu > Developers . > Well Florian Ragwitz and me debianized it and we wanted to keep it under svn > and we worked on it, because there was a real demand for it by many > administrators (I hate to use it as a big brother software, i like to use it > for teaching, so please keep this in mind). > So we decided to put ourselves as uploaders and use Debian Edu Developers for > maintainer-field. > Well we can change this in the next upload. > What is your opinion? Should we also maintain general applications, as we did > with kgeography and italc, or shall we only maintain "skolelinux native" > packages with Debian Edu Developers??? Debian Edu Developpers can maintain both Debian and Debian-Edu applications. > I personally prefer to have the chance to decide it during the debianization, > maybe it is really useful for skolelinux (and of course for debian) so we can > maintain it under Debian Edu Developers. > But i am only one of the whole community, so please give some statements. I think if a software will be used mainly with skolelinux the field should be something like Debian-Edu team as italc : Maintainer: Debian Edu Developers <[email protected]> But if it is a software which will be used both in Debian and Debian-edu and moreover if it's a small package, only one person should be in this field. Friendly, -- Xavier Oswald -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
