Hi, On Thursday 14 December 2006 12:12, Steffen Joeris wrote: > There is currently a build problem of the package in svn and I requested > some time ago that someone interested in docbook stuff should have a look > at it :) > > Why not just simply fix that and upload the package as it is and when we
because it's not simple, otherwise you would have done it already?!
> urge an ftpmaster that we need it for debian-edu, I am sure that they act
> as soon as they have time and in the meanwhile we could use our bugzilla.
I completly dislike our bugzilla. And a half broken debian-edu-doc package
will not make it thru NEW fast. But I would like to start to file
documentation bugs _today_ or ASAP. And I believe "soon as possible" is
closer if we go the way with the pseudo-package.
(And I dont think it's much work for [EMAIL PROTECTED] anyway - I will point
them
to this thread and they can decide..)
Is anybody opposed to the idea of a pseudo-package, all the bugs will be later
available for the real package too. Openoffice.org has been a pseudo-package
for a year, before it was first uploaded to Debian - Ganneff told+suggested
me this today, when I asked him about the possibility of fast tracking
debian-edu-doc for this purpose.
regards,
Holger
pgp1qMHVPkmtP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
