[Ralf Gesellensetter] > may this be the occasion to ask what advantages usplash has over > splashy?
No idea. I started using usplash as it was working without any kernel modifications, while I was not aware of any alternatives doing that at the time. > My impression is that splashy is easier to maintain because it is > independend from the kernel version. Also, I failed to get usplash > working in Debian Testing (no problem with splashy). usplash is working in Debian Etch/Testing. There are some problems with the splash screen stopping half-way through the boot in my qemu, but I am not sure if it times out (15 second timeout, and qemu is slow), or if there is something actually stopping it. Friendly, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
