Patrick Winnertz skrev: > Kurt Gramlich schrieb: > > Hey Guys, >> Not ldap date but it builds up a ldap tree. Regard CipUX with its >> functions more as a replace for webmin as a replace for wlus. >> >> AFAIK DebianEdu configures his own LDAP tree since we are using >> Openldap. >> >> Did you test that it gets not removed during a purge? > > Yes. As I see it, it is not possible to remove cipux completely from the > system and having everything as before. > => violation of the debian policy.
What is left behind, stuff in the configuration file(s), or data in the ldap-db ? I think the later is okay, if slapd is still able to run with cipux removed... >> To build up a ldap tree has to be, anyway which one. Without you >> are not able to use ldap. >> >> So in my view it is not a violation of our policy. > > You modificate things of another package... if we can't use the other > package without doing that or not is not important. The only important > thing is here that config files and data of another package is changed. The modification could easily be done in debian-edu-config, and until slapd.conf and nsswitch.conf is changed to allow inclusion of other files (*.d.../), debian-edu will still need to violate the policy. > So this _is_ an violation of the debian policy. slapd could easily be configured to be cipux ready using debian-edu-config (sample config file symlinked to overwrite slapd.conf, cfengine stuff or ...) -- Finn-Arne Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bzz.no/ EE2A71C6403A3D191FCDC043006F1215062E6642 062E6642 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
