On 4/30/07, RalfGesellensetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear list,
currently I read some irritating news about OLPC: Accordingly costs rise
by 75% up to 175$ due to the decision for supporting windows as OS.
http://newsfeedresearcher.com/data/articles_t17/idt2007.04.28.13.21.24.html
http://news-buzz.info/a/100-laptop-to-cost-175
What else do you know about this issue? Any comments?
I for one was getting worried that the hardware specs were just too
low on the original design. I think the increased cache is very
important. Python reportedly runs as much as 200% to 300% faster now
(http://www.olpctalks.com/ivan_krsti/ivan_krstic_at_google.html) which
is pretty importance since all olpc-specific code is in Python.
--Tom
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]