Torsdag 19. juli 2007, skrev Holger Levsen: > So what? I suggest to rename "tjener" to "blueserver" now. "Server" is > much better understood and "blue" means "serious" ;-) Should I?
My change was actually a response to your e-mail where you suggested to follow this through, after doing a minor change in the press release conserning the 3.0 release. You sugested to update the documentation. So to be fear, I'm a bit confused since my respons of changing file name was after you recomended me to update the LtspDiskless-page. Your reaction is on filenaming, and you use deployment argument where a referecne is used in a package. Then you should be clear about that, and keep the diskussion on that level. I don't think it's productive to scale things out of proportions. Since im not renaming the tjener to bluserver, or making changes to package names, I can't see why your argument apply. And "tjener" is actually a Norwegian lable on "server". Here are two arguments for using the term LowFat, but I don't know if a renaming of a filename in a wiki-page is needed: My experience when talking to hundreds of managers running "centralised" computer installation with hundreds and thousends of installation, is that using good names on solutions. Good naming helps when motivating this manager or head of schools to choose Skolelinux ahead of other solutions. It's also a case where Intel says that they most likely got no interest in selling thin client hardware, but that LowFat is a really nice thing, since you run every end user application locally. Maybe they or other HW manifacturor will use some marketing or salses resources promoting LowFat clients. And to be blunt, diskless is a really good technical term. Promoting that something is less, is not so positiv when reading it. Best regards Knut Yrvin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
