Hi, On Saturday 01 September 2007 11:09, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I propose to update the version of libpam-foreground in the stable > repository from 0.2-0.edu.etch.5 to 0.2-0.edu.etch.5 > 0.4-0.0.edu.etch.1. The changes are trivial, and the new package is a > clean backport from unstable while the package in the stable release > is our fork to add a few patches that later went into the upstream > version and in unstable.
I don't feel fully qualified to comment on this package (atm?), but there are
some things I want to remark:
> Here is the diff -wr output between the two versions:
>
> - * Try harder to correct the rhost test. Patch from Daniel Hess.
Is that still in the package or now gone? Ah, this is #431730. Ok.
> +libpam-foreground (0.3-0ubuntu1) gutsy; urgency=low
> +libpam-foreground (0.3) dapper; urgency=low
> +libpam-foreground (0.2) dapper; urgency=low
> +libpam-foreground (0.1-1) dapper; urgency=low
Aehm ;-) But as the last version has the distribution right, this doesnt
matter... :)
> - * Add --no-start to the dh_installinit call in rules, to avoid
> - cleaning /var/run/console/ on upgrades.
I cant see this. Neither in the removed nor added changes :)
> - * Explicitly link libpam and libc to make lintian happier.
Is that gone?
> diff -uwr libpam-foreground-0.2/debian/dirs
> libpam-foreground-0.4/debian/dirs --- libpam-foreground-0.2/debian/dirs
> 2006-01-23 23:44:43.000000000 +0100 +++ libpam-foreground-0.4/debian/dirs
> 2007-07-13 14:55:49.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
> -usr/bin
> -usr/sbin
> +bin
> +lib/security
Huh?
regards,
Holger
pgpN83I2WnUfc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
