Hi, On Thursday 22 November 2007 16:12, RalfGesellensetter wrote: > According to this logic, there should be a separate hostname for lwat, > shouldn't it?
No, lwat has nothing to do with it. According to this logic, we should create
more (snakeoil) ssl certificates for the different dns names. Currently we
only create one for tjener.intern, maybe we should also create one for
postoffice.intern, one for www.intern and so on.
regards,
Holger
pgp6qR3FwBv9x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
