-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 06:22:08PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: >On Monday 07 July 2008 17:41, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >> >To bundle not, but to write GPL licenced documentation based on it. >> >And our documentation is GPL licenced... >> Really? Do you have some pointers for this limitation. I want to >> understand that in more depth. > >The current documentation is GPL2+. So if we dont want to make it GPL2+ >plus some parts BSD, some other APACHE2 and some other some other >licences, we should stick to one. > >Of course we could include snipplets under other licences, but this >would make the resulting document have a horrible mix of licences.
Ahh - ok: You are talking not about _licensing_ problems but just plain headaches from _juggling_ legally valid licensing mixtures. :-) - Jonas - -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist og Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ - Enden er nær: http://www.shibumi.org/eoti.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkhySWEACgkQn7DbMsAkQLgCHACfYdVAt3+4aQbnOyU3ehWPAk3I sR8AnReSS+IKOv4L2M0TisvLZb2s5yaj =BMmF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
