I should have phrased the question better. What do you see as obstacles that we, Sugar Labs, should work on before you, SkoleLinux, will feel comfortable recommending Sugar as a desktop within SkoleLinux? I got a change to meet Knut Yrvin at OpenMinds a few weeks ago. I would have liked to talk with him more about this. But, I was so busy making notes about overall deployment issues that I didn't get a chance to talk with him. Being spun off from OLPC, thin client, thick client, and low-fat clients were totally new to me. thanks david
On 10/18/2008, 12:21, Holger Levsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:Hi David, thanks for your status report! On Saturday 18 October 2008 18:23, David Farning wrote: > What else should we work on to make it easier for you to include Sugar in > SkoleLinux? Sugar in Skolelinux is the same as Sugar in Debian. regards, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
