Hi, On Freitag, 23. Januar 2009, Andreas Tille wrote: > A package in unstable *is* not necessariyl in testing. The packages.gz > files of the different dists contain different packages. Currently I only > parse unstable for the tasks pages. I might parse all and put the > information about the existence of a certain dependency in the header > information as text or symbolic icon. [...] > IMHO it makes no real sense to keep apache1 in any of our tasks files - > but perhaps I'm wrong. Let's discuss this face to face.
Yeah :) (re: face to face)
What I meant: I think the tasks files for debian-edu (which in our svn trunk
are currently targetted for testing) should be targeted at unstable.
I probably haven't understood the consequences of you parsing other packages
files.
> Well, it is possible sure, but uploading some metapackages of a Blend
> which depends from a not yet available blends-dev sounds not very
> clever and I think there is no real reason for ftpmaster to delay
> editing the override file for a GPLed native Debian package which
> just has some additional binary packages since January 4th.
Well, you could either upload the resulting debian-edu package to experimental
as well - or, if the changes are mostly related to s/cdd/debian pure blend/,
you could and should probably ask ftpmaster to fasttrack that upload to NEW,
since it's targeted at lenny.
regards,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
