On Mon, 26 Jan 2009, RalfGesellensetter wrote:
thank you - I hope everybody is content with their privacy.
I hope after cropping surnames the privacy is better.
Obviously, some people don't like your statics, and started aiming their spam bots to our list.
Do you have any measure that it is *obvious* that my mail triggerd more SPAM? I observed more SPAM too, but the connection to a single mail is not really clear to me.
Please help marking spam (especially in the disguise of "out of office notices") at http://lists.debian.org/debian-edu/2009/01/threads.html (click a message and "report as spam").
Well, I just announced that the processing I did revealed 4500 SPAM mails in our archive. I probably could detect about 2000-3000 more. If only listmaster would answer my mail ------------------------------------------------------------ Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:47:21 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Tille <[email protected]> To: [email protected] cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: Yet another list statistics for debian-enterprise (fwd) ... Once I'm writing to listmaster: What information do you need if I detected potential spam lilke http://people.debian.org/~tille/liststats/potential_spam to make it really useful to clean up the archive? ... ----------------------------------------------------------- What do you expect me to do more? I'm willing to polish the data in any form which is useful for listmaster - but I can not wild guess what this might be. Do you volunteer to ping them? I just need some information which tags they need to remove the spam and I will tweak my script to provide this information. I would even try to parse their code to learn about the needed fields - but a single answer what piece of code might hide this information would be just helpful. Kind regards Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
